P. v. Figueras
In March 2005, defendant Raleigh Figueras pleaded no contest to one count each of identity theft in two 2004 felony complaints. In April 2005, he pleaded no contest to one count of receiving stolen property in the first 2005 felony complaint. The trial court suspended the imposition of sentence and placed him on probation, ordering the payment of a $200 restitution fine in each case. On appeal, the defendant contends the trial court erred in failing to make an express determination that he had the ability to pay the $10 fine for crime prevention programs. He also asks that we avoid any possible ambiguity in the abstract of judgment by amending it to indicate expressly that the $200 restitution fines in the earlier three cases were the subject of an earlier court order, in order to prevent any double collection. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Figueras