legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Rosa F. v. Sup. Ct.
Rosa F., mother of dependent children Emilia D. (born in 1998), Selena D. (born in 1999), and Emiliano D. (born in 2000) (collectively, the children),[1]petitions for extraordinary writ review of orders setting a permanency planning hearing and terminating reunification services. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.22, 366.26;[2]California Rules of Court, rule 8.452.) Rosa contends that the evidence does not support the juvenile courts findings that the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) provided her with adequate reunification services and that her children would be at substantial risk if returned to her custody; she also maintains that the court erred by failing to exercise its discretion to extend reunification services. Court deny the writ.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale