legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Wade
Defendant appeals from judgment entered following his no contest plea to possession of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, 11350, subd. (a)) and his admission that he suffered a prior conviction of a serious or violent felony within the meaning of the Three Strikes law. (Pen. Code, 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d); 667, subds. (b)-(i).) He was sentenced to prison for four years, consisting of the middle term of two years doubled pursuant to the Three Strikes law. He did not request a certificate of probable cause.
Court have examined the entire record and are satisfied that no arguable issues exist. Having failed to obtain a certificate of probable cause, appellants appeal following his no contest plea is limited to issues relating to search and seizure and issues regarding proceedings held subsequent to his plea. (See People v. Buttram (2003) 30 Cal.4th 773, 780. Further, issues cognizable on appeal are confined to matters contained in the appellate record.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale