P. v. McClendon
Defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction of multiple counts of lewd acts upon a child under the age of 14 years, possession of child pornography, and sending harmful matter with intent to seduce a child. He contends the trial court erred in (1) denying his request to substitute retained counsel for previously retained counsel; (2) excluding certain testimony by a defense expert witness; and (3) giving CALJIC No. 2.50.01. He also contends he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. McClendon