P. v. Compean
Jose Manuel Compean appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of possessing methamphetamine for purposes of sale, (Health & Saf. Code, 11378) and possessing marijuana for purposes of sale ( 11359). He contends his conviction must be reversed because (1) the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress, (2) the court erred when it admitted certain evidence at his trial, and (3) the prosecutor committed misconduct at trial and during final argument. Court conclude no prejudicial errors were committed at appellants trial and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Compean