P. v. Corea
Raul Rueda Corea appeals from a judgment after a jury convicted him of two counts of making fraudulent statements to obtain workers compensation benefits. Corea argues the trial court erroneously instructed the jury, insufficient evidence supports his convictions, and the court erroneously admitted evidence. As Court explain below more fully, two of his contentions have merit. Therefore, Court need not address his other claims. Court reverse the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Corea