P. v. Falcon
Appellant argues that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction for dissuading a victim by force or threat. He also argues the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury, sua sponte, on the crime of dissuading a victim as a lesser included offense. Finally, he contends the court erred in failing to give CALJIC No. 5.54 (self-defense by an aggressor) on its own motion. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Falcon