In re A.Y.
Father and Mother appeal from the juvenile courts order sustaining dependency jurisdiction over their daughters, A., age 16, and J., age 15. The parents challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the order. They contend father posed no risk of serious physical harm, emotional damage, or sexual abuse to the girls, and consequently mother did not neglect the children by failing to protect them from father. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 300, subds. (a), (b), (c) & (d); all further statutory references are to this code unless specified otherwise.) Alternatively, they contend the children should have been left in mothers care. Court conclude ample evidence supports the courts order, and Court therefore affirm.
Comments on In re A.Y.