legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Barnes v. Cissna
Plaintiff sued defendant and appellant Robert Cissna (Cissna) for specific performance of a contract concerning the sale of real property. A default judgment was entered against Cissna and Cissna now appeals. Barnes has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely filed. Cissna claims that, despite the fact the record contains a copy of a proof of service of notice of entry of judgment, he had no actual knowledge of the default judgment until shortly before he filed his notice of appeal. This being the case, he insists that the limitations period for filing a notice of appeal is inapplicable. The motion to dismiss is granted.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale