legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Madrigal
Defendant entered a negotiated plea of guilty to two counts of first degree burglary in exchange for dismissal of the remaining counts and a stipulated prison term of five years and four months. The trial court imposed two $1,000 restitution fines that had not been mentioned by the prosecutor when he recited the parties plea agreement.
On appeal, defendant contends that imposition of the fine violated his plea agreement, thereby entitling him to have the fine reduced to the statutory minimum of $200 pursuant to People v. Walker (1991) 54 Cal.3d 1013. For the reasons stated in the California Supreme Courts recent decision in People v. Crandell (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1301, Court reject the contention and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale