Skouti v. Britz Fertilizers
This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for claims arising from damage to approximately 1,000 acres of grapes and vines. Defendant and appellant Britz Fertilizers, Inc. (hereafter defendant), contends it should have been allowed to call as a witness an expert who had previously been designated by plaintiff and respondent Ahmad Skouti (hereafter plaintiff) but who had withdrawn from the case because of asserted medical problems. Defendant also contends plaintiff was allowed to present expert evidence of the extent of permanent damage to the vines when there was no foundation for such testimony. Finally, defendant contends plaintiff presented insufficient evidence to support the award of damages for loss of economic opportunity. Court reject defendants claims and affirm the judgment.
Comments on Skouti v. Britz Fertilizers