P. v. Smith
Defendant appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial in which he was convicted of first degree premeditated murder, in which a principal was armed with a firearm. Defendant contends that a statement he made to the police should have been suppressed under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [86 S.Ct. 1602] (Miranda), a police witness improperly expressed his personal belief that defendant was involved in the murder, and the prosecutor committed misconduct. Defendant further contends that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance in various respects. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Smith