legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Tewolde
On February 20, 2007, the United States Supreme Court issued an order in this case granting certiorari, vacating the judgment, and remanding to this court for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California (2007) 549 U.S. [127 S.Ct. 856, 166 L.Ed.2d 856] (Cunningham).
Pursuant to this mandate, Court have recalled the remittitur. We have re-examined our initial opinion in this case (People v. Tewolde (Mar. 21, 2005, A106273) [nonpub. opn.]), which remains on file with this court, and which we hereby incorporate by reference into this order.
Court have reconsidered our prior opinion in light of Cunningham, which simply applies Blakely to California sentencing law. Cunningham only confirms the validity of our initial holding. Because Court deem it unnecessary to modify our prior opinion, Court reiterate that opinion in its entirety. (City of Long Beach v. Bozek (1983) 33 Cal.3d 727, 728.).

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale