P. v. Baltazar
Defendant was convicted of three counts of second degree robbery and one count of possession of a firearm by a felon, with findings that the robberies had been committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang, that Baltazar had used a shotgun during the commission of all three robberies, and that he had suffered two prior strike convictions. (Pen. Code, 211, 12021, subd. (a)(1), 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(C), 12022.53, subd. (b), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d), 667, subds. (b)-(i).)[1] Baltazar appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence in support of the gang enhancement and claiming the trial court should have stricken one of his prior strikes. Court disagree and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Baltazar