Salazar v. Patel
Plaintiff Doralisa Salazar (Salazar) appeals from a judgment awarding her nearly $1,500 for injuries she sustained in a motor vehicle accident. Salazar contends the trial court erred when it denied her motion for a new trial based on juror misconduct, misconduct of defense counsel during closing argument, and inadequate damages. As Court explain, Court agree that defense counsel committed misconduct during closing argument, and that such misconduct resulted in prejudice. Accordingly, Court reverse the judgment.
Comments on Salazar v. Patel