Gonzales v. Pacific Specialty Ins.
Court hold that compliance with former Insurance Code section 791.10, subdivision (a)(1), which governs adverse underwriting decisions, was not sufficient to constitute compliance with former Insurance Code section 677, which governs the cancellation of a homeowners insurance policy. Under Lee v. Industrial Indemnity Co. (1986) 177 Cal.App.3d 921 (Lee), strict compliance with former section 677 was required in order to cancel a homeowners insurance policy. Court reverse a trial court order striking class allegations.
Comments on Gonzales v. Pacific Specialty Ins.