legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Arreygue
Appellant was convicted of one count of attempted premeditated murder (count 1), three counts of assault with a firearm (counts 2, 3, and 4), one count of shooting at an occupied motor vehicle (count 6), and related allegations. He was sentenced to an indeterminate term of 40 years to life on count 1, consecutive to a determinate term of 33 years on counts 2, 3, and 4. He argues, and respondent concedes, that count 6 must be stricken due to the statute of limitations. Appellant and respondent further agree that there are problems with the length of the street gang enhancements that were imposed on counts 3 and 4. The only disputed issue is the effect of Cunningham v. California (2007) 549 U.S. [127 S.Ct. 856](Cunningham) on imposition of the upper term on count 2.
Court strike count 6, modify the sentence on the gang enhancements on counts 3 and 4, and otherwise affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale