P. v. Pickering
By information filed September 6, 2006, it was alleged appellant committed attempted second degree robbery (Pen. Code, 212.5, subd. (c), 664)[1] and that he had suffered a prior felony conviction that qualified as a strike[2]and as a prior serious felony conviction ( 667, subd. (a)), and that he had served four separate prison terms for prior felony convictions ( 667.5, subd. (b).) Appellants appointed appellate counsel has filed an opening brief which summarizes the pertinent facts, with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks that this court independently review the record. (Peoplev.Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Appellant himself, in response to this courts invitation to supplemental briefing, has submitted a brief in which he argues, as best Court can determine, that (1) he was denied his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel, and (2) his plea was neither knowing, voluntary nor intelligent. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Pickering