legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Meyers
A jury found defendant guilty of grand theft from a person (Pen. Code, 487, subd. (c); further undesignated section references are to this code), a lesser included offense to the charged crime of robbery ( 211). The trial court suspended imposition of sentence, placing defendant on five years probation and ordering him to serve one year in county jail. On appeal, defendant contends the jurys verdict is not supported by substantial evidence because there was no evidence he did anything to separate the purse from the victims person, and that the trial court failed to instruct the jury as to the lesser included offense of petty larceny. Because defendants first contention has merit, Court reverse the judgment of conviction for grand theft person and direct that the trial court enter a judgment for petty theft and modify the sentence accordingly. In all other respects Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale