Spiteri v. State of California
Carmel Spiteri appeals pro se from a judgment entered following the granting of respondent Ray Canter's motion for summary judgment on a single cause of action. The motion was granted after the trial court had sustained without leave to amend demurrers to four other causes of action. The demurrers were filed by Canter and the following respondents: The State of California (State), the California Department of Corrections (CDC), the Parole and Community Services Division (PCSD), Dennis Acosta, and Victoria Wood. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrers and in granting the motion for summary judgment. Court affirm.
Comments on Spiteri v. State of California