legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Reed
Defendant appeals from the judgment after a jury found him guilty as charged of two counts of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, 211; counts 1, 4),[1]two counts of false imprisonment by violence ( 236; counts 2, 5), and one count of assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury. ( 245, subd. (a)(1); count 3.) The trial court found true the allegations that as to each of the five counts, defendant suffered several prior serious felony convictions ( 667, subd. (a)(1)), two prior separate prison terms ( 667.5, subd. (b)), and 13 prior strike convictions. ( 667, subds. (b)-(i).) The trial court imposed a total unstayed prison term of 100 years to life plus 28 years.
On appeal, defendant contends imposition of consecutive sentences on two counts of false imprisonment violates section 654 and Blakely v. Washington (2004) 542 U.S. 296 [159 L.Ed.2d 403] (Blakely). In a supplemental opening brief, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury.
Court agree with defendant that his conviction for felony assault must be reversed and order that the abstract of judgment be amended. Court find no other error and shall affirm the judgment as amended.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale