In re D.K.
Appellant D.K. contends (1) the juvenile court failed to comply with applicable law in determining he was not an individual with exceptional educational needs; (2) the juvenile court erred in failing to declare at disposition whether his offenses in the current and previously sustained petitions were misdemeanors or felonies; and (3) the juvenile court abused its discretion in its commitment choice.
Court affirm the order.
Comments on In re D.K.