P. v. Ingram
Defendant and appellant Tyrone Ingram contends that trial court imposed an illegal sentence when it resentenced defendant after we remanded the case back to the trial court for resentencing. We find that defendants argument is barred by the doctrine of the law of the case.
In a supplemental brief, defendant contends that the imposition of the aggravated term violates the United States Supreme Courts recent decision in Cunningham v. California (2007) U.S., [127 S.Ct. 856, 166 L.Ed.2d 856] (Cunningham). Court agree that the imposition of the aggravated term violates Cunningham. Therefore, Court remand the matter to the trial court for resentencing.
Comments on P. v. Ingram