P. v. Fox
Defendant Chasity Fox appeals from a superior court order recommitting her to involuntary treatment as a mentally disordered offender pursuant to Penal Code section 2970 et seq. In an evidentiary hearing on the Peoples petition for continued involuntary treatment, defendant contends the trial court abused its discretion by allowing a psychiatrist, who was the sole testifying expert, to recount the details of a report by a non testifying expert. Absent the alleged error, defendant believes the trial court would have concluded she is suitable for outpatient treatment.
Comments on P. v. Fox