Bell v. UCLAHarborMedicalCenter
UCLA Harbor Medical Center (Harbor) appeals a judgment entered against it after a jury awarded Patrick Bell (Bell) $150,000 on his medical malpractice claim. During voir dire, Harbors peremptory challenge of a juror was disallowed because it was impermissibly based on race. Harbor contends that the trial courts reseating the challenged juror was reversible error. Harbor also contends that the verdict was not supported by substantial evidence, that its motion for a new trial based on attorney misconduct should have been granted and that the jury was improperly instructed on the willful suppression of evidence. Court find no merit to these contentions and affirm the judgment.
Comments on Bell v. UCLAHarborMedicalCenter