legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re L.O.
Vanessa P. (mother) is the mother of L.O., now six years old. Mother challenges the juvenile courts order entered under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, terminating her parental rights to L.O. Specifically, mother argues that the juvenile court abused its discretion when it declined to grant the brief continuance requested by mothers counsel so that counsel could check voice mail to determine whether mother had left a message as to why she was not present at the section 366.26 hearing. Court conclude that, while we might have made a different decision depending on how busy the juvenile courts calendar was, the ruling denying the brief continuance was not an abuse of discretion. Court affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale