P. v. Carlton
Defendant Colleen Marie Carlton appeals from a three-year sentence imposed upon the revocation of her probation. She argues her sentence should be reversed because the trial court abused its discretion by disregarding or not properly weighing mitigating facts about the offense and then imposing the middle term despite strong mitigating factors supporting the lower term. She also contends her sentence should be reversed because the trial court relied on a probation report to impose the three year sentence, but the report contained false and incomplete information.
The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Carlton