legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Ralph M.
Court issue this opinion after granting respondents petition for rehearing to our previous unpublished opinion in this case.The juvenile court found that appellant Ralph M. came within the provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code section 602, for committing first degree residential burglary. It committed him to the camp community placement program for six months.
Prior to our order of rehearing, Ralph raised these issues: (1) the juvenile court sustained the petition without finding that the charges were proved beyond a reasonable doubt, (2) his predisposition credits were improperly computed, and (3) some of the probation conditions are improper. Court resolve this case based on the record and the sufficiency issue, and do not address certain other issues that have been raised by appellant after our order granting rehearing. Applying the applicable standard of review, we reverse because the record does not contain substantial evidence, evidence that is reasonable, credible and of solid value such that a reasonable trier of fact could find [appellant] guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. (People v. Kraft (2000) 23 Cal.4th 978, 1053; In re Winship (1970) 397 U.S. 358, 368.)



Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale