In re Amanda G.
Appellant Jacqueline G. appeals from orders denying her petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 and terminating her parental rights to her daughter, Amanda G., under section 366.26. She contends that because her section 388 petition showed both significantly changed circumstances and that reunification was in Amandas best interest, the dependency court abused its discretion in denying her petition. She also maintains that the dependency court used an incorrect standard in evaluating and determining her petition. Court find no error or abuse of discretion and affirm.
Comments on In re Amanda G.