legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Williams v. Interinsurance Exchange
The trial court in this case denied the defendant insurer's motion to certify a group of its policyholders as a class of cross-defendants. In the underlying claim against the defendant, the plaintiff class representative alleged finance charges defendant collects on premium installments are also premiums which, in violation of Insurance Code section 381, the defendant did not set forth on the face of the insurer's standard form policies. By way of its cross-complaint the defendant alleged that if its finance charges should have been set forth as premiums in its policies, the class members' policies should be reformed to comply with the requirements of Insurance Code section 381.
In a related writ proceeding this court has issued a writ of mandate directing that the trial court enter an order granting the insurer's summary judgment on the plaintiff's underlying claim and the remittitur in this case has now issued. Accordingly, Court dismiss as moot defendant's appeal in this case.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale