P. v. Smith
Convicted of assaulting his fianc and related crimes, defendant David Joe Smith contends: (1) the trial court erred in permitting the prosecution to offer evidence of a prior spousal abuse conviction; (2) the court erred in failing to instruct the jury on mistake of fact as a defense to a burglary charge; and (3) his trial counsel was ineffective in several regards. Finding no error or ineffective assistance of counsel, Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Smith