In re Ana M.
Ana D. appeals from orders terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26) to her three young children.[1] She contends the court erred by denying her earlier petition to regain custody ( 388) and request for a bonding study. She also argues it was error to terminate her rights because: there was no evidence of the childrens wishes regarding adoption ( 366.26, subd. (h)(1)); and there was evidence termination would be detrimental to the children based on their relationship with her ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(A)). On review, Court affirm.
Comments on In re Ana M.