P. v. Smith
Michael Smith appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court found him guilty of failing to register as a sex offender. (Pen. Code, 290, subd. (g)(2).) He contends (1) the court erred when evaluating his competency to stand trial; (2) the court failed to hold a meaningful competency hearing; (3) his conviction was not supported by substantial evidence; and (4) the court abused its discretion when it declined to strike a prior strike finding. Court reject these arguments and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Smith