In re Destiny C.
Nicole C. (mother) appeals from an order terminating her parental rights to her twin daughters Destiny and Jasmine C. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26.)[1] She contends: (1) the eligibility of the childrens guardians as prospective adoptive parents had not been adequately assessed because respondent San Francisco Department of Human Services (DHS) did not comply with the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (ICPC) before the girls moved from California to Texas with their guardians and prospective adoptive parents; (2) the evidence was insufficient to prove the children were adoptable; (3) termination of parental rights was detrimental to the children because it would interfere with sibling relationships; and (4) the trial court abused its discretion in denying mothers section 388 motion seeking additional reunification services and erroneously precluded mother from eliciting evidence of the childrens best interests for purposes of that motion. Court affirm.
Comments on In re Destiny C.