legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Guzman
Appellant was convicted in January 2005 of five counts of violating Penal Code section 288, subdivision (a),[1]by committing lewd and lascivious acts on a child under the age of 14, specifically his nine-year old daughter, starting in April 1991. Appellant contends that the statute of limitations bars his conviction, but the trial court held that the applicable statute had been extended by the enactment of former section 803, subdivision (g) (section 803(g)). Appellant contends that statute is an unconstitutional revival statute. Consistent with the holdings of several of our sister courts, Court disagree and hence affirm appellants conviction.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale