Luckett v. Agelopoulos
Plaintiff Sonja Luckett appeals from a judgment following a jury verdict in favor of defendant John Agelopoulos in her personal injury action against him. Luckett contends the (1) trial court improperly admitted testimony of a biomechanical expert. She also contends the trial court erroneously denied her motion for new trial because (2) the closing argument by Agelopouloss counsel constituted prejudicial misconduct, (3) her affidavits established prejudicial juror misconduct, and (4) there was insufficient evidence in support of the verdict. Moreover, she argues that (5) the errors below, though independently harmless, are cumulatively prejudicial and warrant reversal. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on Luckett v. Agelopoulos