legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Daily v. Racine
Karen Daily sued Robert E. Racine for legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, and fraud. Racines demurrer was sustained without leave to amend and Daily (in propria persona) appealed. We affirmed. (Daily v. Racine (Feb. 23, 2007, B186944) [nonpub. opn.].) Meanwhile, Racine had moved for an order obligating Daily to pay his attorneys fees, contending Dailys legal malpractice suit was an action based upon a contract within the meaning of an attorneys fee provision in his retainer agreement. The trial court agreed, and ordered Daily to pay $19,386.60 to Racine for his fees and costs. Daily (once again appearing in propria persona) appeals. Court reverse the attorney fee award but affirm the cost award.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale