In re Christian M.
Beatriz M. and Leopoldo C. (together the parents) appeal a judgment of the juvenile court terminating their parental rights to their minor son, Christian M., under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.[1] The parents challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the court's findings the beneficial parent-child relationship exception of section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A) and the sibling relationship exception of section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(E) did not apply to preclude terminating their parental rights. Leopoldo further contends the court erred by denying his request for a continuance of the selection and implementation hearing. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re Christian M.