Marriage of Hood
In this marital dissolution action between petitioner/appellant Charles Hood and respondent Edit-Gonzalez Hood, Charles appeals from "the statement of decision and order entered on December 6, 2005," which was a supplemental judgment that in part denied him reimbursement for certain payments and contributions, and characterized his bank accounts as community property. Charles contends he was denied due process when the trial court excluded "relevant documentary evidence because the documents had not been attached as exhibits to [his] settlement brief as required by the Local Rules." Court affirm.
Comments on Marriage of Hood