P. v. Raye
In January 2003, defendant Marlon Raye was arrested for driving while his drivers license was suspended or revoked. An inventory of his car revealed five grams of methamphetamine, a glass smoking pipe, and two straws with residue. Defendant pled no contest to transporting methamphetamine and admitted that he committed the crime while released on bail or his own recognizance following his arrest for a felony. He was placed on Proposition 36 probation.
In August 2004 and again in September 2005, defendant admitted violating conditions of his Proposition 36 probation. Each time, probation was reinstated.
Court's review of the record discloses that the abstract of judgment must be corrected to reflect that the laboratory analysis fee is $50 (not $170 as shown on the abstract), and that the court imposed an $85 penalty assessment on the laboratory analysis fee and a $250 penalty assessment on the drug program fee. All fines and fees must be set forth in the abstract of judgment. [Citation.] (People v. High (2004) 119 Cal.App.4th 1192, 1200.)
Comments on P. v. Raye