P. v. Salazar In re Christy M.
Defendant was convicted by jury trial of robbery. On appeal, he contends (1) the trial court erred by failing to instruct sua sponte on the lesser included offense of theft and (2) the instruction on a witnesss inconsistent statements (CALCRIM No. 318) created an improper presumption. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Salazar In re Christy M.