P. v. Verma
Jai Verma appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of grand theft by embezzlement. (Pen. Code, 487, subd. (a), 508.) He contends (1) his conviction is not supported by substantial evidence, (2) the trial court instructed the jurors incorrectly, and (3) the court may have committed an error when imposing a restitution fine. Court reject these arguments and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Verma