Martin Cadillac Co. v. Pierson
Plaintiff Martin Cadillac Company, Inc. (Martin) appeals from a judgment entered as the result of the trial court granting a special motion to strike brought by defendants John K. Pierson, Leonard B. Ference, Pierson Law Firm, APLC (collectively Pierson) and Cyrus Maloo (Maloo) under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, Californias anti-SLAPP[1](Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) statute,[2]in response to Martins lawsuit against Pierson for malicious prosecution of an underlying personal injury action arising out of a vehicle accident. Court affirm.
Comments on Martin Cadillac Co. v. Pierson