Wright v. Wright
After a bench trial, the court ordered a partition by sale of a residence owned by the trust of Mabel Wright (Mabel) and the trust of her deceased husband, George Wright (George). The court rejected Mabels attempt to enforce a life estate in the residence under an oral agreement with George. On appeal from the judgment, Mabel challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, the trial courts rulings on statutes of limitations defenses to Mabels claims, and an order bifurcating a legal malpractice action against the lawyer involved in drafting the trusts for George and Mabel. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on Wright v. Wright