legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Lockhart
In a bench trial, John D. Lockhart was convicted of selling marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, 11360, subd. (a)) and possession of marijuana for sale (Health & Saf. Code, 11359). Lockhart admitted two prior strike convictions (Pen. Code, 667, subds. (b) - (i)) and two prior prison terms ( 667.5, subd. (b)). The trial court granted Lockhart's request to dismiss the prior strike conviction allegations, and sentenced him to three years in prison for selling marijuana and a concurrent two years in prison for possession of marijuana for sale. The court dismissed the two prior prison term enhancement allegations.

Lockhart contends the court erred by imposing a concurrent sentence for the possession for sale count rather than staying execution of the sentence for that count under section 654. In a supplemental brief, Lockhart claims his conviction for possession of marijuana for sale violated double jeopardy principles because under the facts of this case the possession for sale crime is a lesser included offense of the selling crime. He also contends the principles of double jeopardy preclude his conviction for possession for sale even if that offense is not a lesser included offense of sale.
The sentence on the possession for sale count (count 2) is modified to stay execution of the sentence. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale