legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Haskell
Gary Haskell appeals from the judgment entered following his pre preliminary hearing plea of guilty to two counts of identify theft and one count of theft and resulting sentence to the low term for identity theft (a concurrent term was imposed on the second identity theft count and sentence for theft was stayed). The crimes were committed between October 23 and December 10, 2006, when defendant, while working at a restaurant, used a stolen credit card to create false food bills, including a tip for himself.
Court have examined the entire record and are satisfied that defendants attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 109110; Peoplev.Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.) The judgment is affirmed.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale