P. v. McKenzie
Defendant challenges his conviction for first degree murder on the ground his trial was tainted by prejudicial misconduct by both the prosecutor and the jury. We find the prosecutor engaged in a troubling and extensive pattern of misconduct. But upon careful analysis of the entire record, we are convinced that the misconduct did not affect the verdict. We also find the claim of prejudicial juror misconduct unpersuasive. Accordingly, Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. McKenzie