P. v. Reahm
Defendant pled guilty to petty theft with a prior conviction. (Pen. Code, 666.) At the sentencing, defendant was sentenced for two different cases, one of which is the subject of this appeal. In both cases, defendant was sentenced to two years in state prison with the sentences to run concurrently. On appeal, defendant essentially contends that he was denied due process because he was charged with and convicted of a violation of section 666, and not a violation of a substantive offense.
Comments on P. v. Reahm