Orosco v. Smith
Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to set aside a default judgment entered in favor of plaintiff James R. Orosco. Orosco has failed to file a responsive brief. Because of that failure, we have denied Oroscos request for oral argument, and decide the case on the record and Smiths opening brief. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.220(a)(2).) Court strike the award of punitive damages from the judgment and affirm the order denying relief from default.
Comments on Orosco v. Smith