Marriage of Bell
Husband has paid support to his wife (respondent) since the termination of their marriage in 1989. Is husband entitled to decrease substantially or cease that support because of his desire to retire at age 70? In objecting to husbands request to do so, is respondent entitled to assert, among other factors, her continuing obligation to care for the parties grandchild.
Court reverse the trial court decision, directing the trial court to reconsider its order in light of husbands decrease in income, any additional income received by respondent from her own investments, and our finding that husband has no obligation to provide for the support to his granddaughter.
Comments on Marriage of Bell